In 1980, the city finally developed
and constructed transfer terminals that operated like subway
stations. The terminals, constructed with telephone accessibility,
attracted newsstands and flower shops and became aesthetically
attractive and user friendly.
It was also at this time that the
city introduced automatic ticketing to the system. This form of
payment allowed passengers to purchase metal tokens at terminals,
newsstands or shops, or pay with money at the bus terminals. They
hoped to increase the speed of transfers and boarding of passengers
which would expedite bus circulation. The city believed that under
careful planning of transfers, passengers could travel throughout
the system for only one fare. Despite the fare issues, the city had
to deal with the overwhelming attraction of the express system. Upon
its implementation in 1974, its novelty and popularity resulted in
overcrowded busses that caused delays in boarding at stops and
terminals. To compensate for the loss in time, bus drivers would
increase speed, creating potentially dangerous situations and
accidents. The city found it necessary to implement speed control
monitors, create boarding tubes and tailor bus designs to
accommodate the growing demand.
The city also had to create a
system in which individual bus companies that catered to the various
zones in the city could share revenues without competing with each
other. Traditionally the city was partitioned in different zones
that were serviced by individual bus companies. But, with the
creation of the inter-district routes and the implementation of the
Integrated Transportation Network along with the unified fare,
passengers could pay one company at a terminal located in a
particular zone and ride the system without paying the other bus
companies. In 1987 the city addressed this problem by distributing
transportation revenue based on the number of kilometers traveled by
vehicle type for any given company. With each company given a number
of route kilometers and a timetable, each company competes with the
schedule not with other companies (Rabinovitch and Hoehn, 1995).
Bus and Station Design
After the construction of terminals
and the implementation of the unified fare, the city wanted to
develop busses and stations designed with the intention of avoiding
fare evaders. For this reason, busses are designed with three doors,
two doors for exiting and a front door for boarding. In a category
by itself, these urban busses are constructed with turbo engines,
lower floor levels, wider doors, and a convenient design for mass
transit. Curitiba also developed boarding tube stations that were
placed along direct routes and express lanes. To increase
convenience, boarding efficiency and reduce fare evaders the tubes
elevate passengers to the bus platform level where automatic doors
operated by the tube conductor open parallel to the bus doors.
Passengers pay an entrance fare at the turnstile and wait for their
respective direct or express bus to pass. Disembarking passengers
leave the stations through a direct exit.
To further assist passengers, each
tube station is equipped with station and route maps and with small
lifts situated beside the entrance of the tube to help disabled
passengers, strollers, and passengers carrying heavy bags enter the
tubes with agility.
The Present System of
Transportation
The transportation system is made
up of three complementary levels of service that include the feeder
lines, express lines and inter-district routes. The feeder lines
pass through outlying neighborhoods and make the system easily
accessible to lower density areas. Sharing the roads with other
vehicles, these feeder lines connect with the express system along
the structural corridors.
The express system then utilizes these
dedicated bus lanes and transports large numbers of passengers to
various locations along these structural corridors, thus operating
much like a surface subway system. The inter-district routes allow
passengers to connect to the axis of the express lines without
entering the central city area. The Integrated Transportation
Network (ITN) encompasses transfer terminals, express routes, direct
routes using boarding tubes, feeder and inter-district routes
supplemented by center city routes, neighborhood routes, night
routes, special education routes, and pro-park routes which
collectively make up Curitiba’s Mass Transit System (MTS). Through
carefully planned tube or terminal connections, passengers can pay
one fare and travel throughout the system. To facilitate use of the
system, passengers can identify a specific route by the color and
type of the bus used. The thirteen express lines that make up the
express bus system for instance, operate on the structural corridors
and are represented by large red articulated, bi-articulated or
silver “padron” busses.
Articulated and bi-articulated
busses are large busses capable of carrying 170-270 passengers
respectively and are joined in the center by a pivot joint and
flexible tubing that allows the bus to curve around turns without
occupying more than one lane of traffic. Articulated busses have one
joint and bi-articulated have at least two connected units. They are
virtually like a train with connected cars. These busses connect the
transfer terminals to the city center. Passengers pay, enter and
exit at tube stations.
The feeder routes are characterized
by orange conventional busses that connect the terminals with the
surrounding neighborhoods.
Inter-district routes use green
padron or articulated busses that connect transfer Terminals to
different districts without passing through the center of the city.
The direct speedy routes are silver and use the tube stations along
routes that link the main district and surrounding municipalities
with Curitiba. Then there are Conventional Integration Radial Routes
that are marked by yellow padron busses. They operate on the normal
road network between the surrounding municipalities, the integration
terminals, and the city center. The City Circle Line is a fleet of
white mini-busses that circle the major transport terminals and
different points of interest in the downtown area. All school busses
are marked with a yellow stripe and busses dedicated for the
disabled are blue. The Integrated Transport System is made up of 340
routes that utilize 1,902 busses to transport 1.9 million passengers
per day. The entire network covers 1,100km of roads with 60km of it
dedicated for bus use. There are 25 transfer terminals within the
system and 221 tube stations that all allow for pre-paid boarding.
The Integrated System also has 28 routes and special busses
dedicated to transporting special education and disabled patrons.
Conclusions
Curitiba’s system of transportation
is an example of effective urban planning. The city’s urban planners
recognized that even if growth in population cannot be controlled,
the development of infrastructure in the city can guide the city’s
expansion. By approaching transportation as tool used to attain a
greater solution rather than as a solution to an advancing problem,
they were able to implement an efficiently constructed,
cost-effective transportation system that finances itself. The city
used busses because it had a tradition of using busses. While this
system is powered by diesel, the reduction of the number of cars
used compensates, if not surpasses, the difference in carbon
monoxide emissions. Like every city, Curitiba’s transportation
system is plagued by overcrowded peak hours and untimely busses.
But, this is a relatively minor inconvenience in comparison to the
service provided and the proximity served. From personal experience
I can testify to the agility of this system. In comparison with
transportation systems in Rio de Janiero, where passengers have to
flag down and run after a number of private busses that provide
service to the same destination using different routes and New York
City were busses are often caught in unrelenting city congestion for
a good part of the working day, Curitiba's integrative bus system
with its express lanes and bus expediency, essentially works.